![]() WP:ATA also mentions that not everything that one feels "important" or "latest" is allowed in Wikipedia. Now, why delete these results? Per WP:IINFO, pure statistics without explanation of what they mean is not allowed.Well, that is true, so I made no further attempt to get it back. Because Wikipedia does not allow pure statistics and numbers like this, I previously tried to explain the meaning of these numbers, but my edit was reverted as unsubstantiated claim without a source. First, what are the reasons to keep this sentence or expand it? The answer of the involved editor seems to be "because it is important" and "because it is the latest results".It seems a full discussion is inevitable. I myself am involved and have gone both ways in an attempt to strike a compromise, but to no avail. "Īpparently, a group of users want it deleted (or partially deleted) while another want it to remain and even expanded. "In their March-April 2013 tests of 26 antivirus products, Comodo Internet Security Premium scored 6 for protection, 4 for performance and 2.5 for usability. Recent edit history shows that the following area of the article is disputed: when problem doesn't exist.? Fleet Command ( talk) 10:01, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Reply ![]() deleting the problem and the solution together. But actually, someone seems to have deleted almost everything in that section. Since I already have six real-life articles to translate on my hand right now, I can't promise anything, but maybe I'll cover it in the future. Pol098 ( talk) 09:44, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Reply Bravo! That's what we call sound evidence. I won't go on, just justifying the POV flag - read the review. I don't want to spend ages on this, I'm not promoting or condemning the review, just reporting the first negative criticism I found, this is a Talk page not an article. Also the promise of 60 days free technical support for the free version was not met. I won't myself make any comment on this point (see the discussion), but add the following to justify the POV flag: CIS was roundly criticised for specific failures to detect threats in a review. This prompted a discussion on my Talk page between FleetCommand and someone who agreed with the POV flag. I placed a POV flag on the Crtical reception section" with text "((POV-section|reason=there is criticism that CIS is intrusive and complicated to use, though effective")) which was removed by FleetCommand due to " introducing any evidence or opening a talk page thread". Software articles in Wikipedia have always been a target for accusation of being written like an advertisements, even those that are selected as Good Articles or (most surprisingly) Featured Articles! If you feel an article is written like an advertisement, please highlight the areas which seem boastful, not from a neutral point of view or not verifiable by a reliable secondary source.įleet Command ( talk) 06:39, (UTC) Reply POV flag on "Critical reception Do not offend an article, just state its problem and do not do so in vague terms. It reaks of being written by the company itself. It needs to be redone from begining to end. while CIS good at what it does, there does not have to be so many accolades in the intro, it detracts from the main purpose of the article. It has been stated by Comodo's CEO, Melih Abdulhayoglu, that they plan to have one of the best, if not the best, Antivirus' by a year after its launch. I believe that there are many claims and biased points of view cited in this article so as to render it a promotional or advertisement article. Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with: Computer Security Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer Security Template:WikiProject Computer Security Computer Security articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.Ĭomputer Security : Computing Start‑class Mid‑importance This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Software Wikipedia:WikiProject Software Template:WikiProject Software software articles This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. Software : Computing Start‑class Mid‑importance ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |